← Ranking

PRL

Pearl · Proof-of-Useful-Work L1 (GPU matrix-multiplication mining pitched as AI compute)

17 /100
T5Impaired · #74 of 77
No engine yetStableReviewed Oct 23, 2026
DemandSoundnessDurability
6 of 459 of 402 of 15

Key facts

SupplyFloat 17% of issued supply
  • Circulating 356.0M, 17%
  • Locked or unvested 1.74B, 83%
  • Max 2.10B
FDV / market cap
5.9x
$4.2B / $707.6M
Market cap
$707.6M
Price $1.99, 7d +18.6%

Market data: CoinGecko, Oct 24, 2026. Scores reviewed Oct 23, 2026.

Assessment

Pearl has no value engine: all fees go to miners, there is no burn, staking or inference marketplace, and PRL pays only transfer fees on its own chain. There was no premine, sale or VC, but difficulty-1 genesis minted 121.7M in six days, ~34% of all PRL issued, partly to fund the team. Kryptex mined ~49% of blocks over 30 days on a single-client chain under a year old, just short of a single-pool majority. Supply is the binding problem: ~1.0M PRL a day is mined, about 100% a year of the ~354M issued, on a curve that reaches ~646M by Oct 2027.

How value reaches holders

Nothing reaches holders: all fees go to miners, with no burn, staking, smart contracts or inference marketplace. Issuance follows S(h) = 2.1B*h/(h+650,226): ~342M mined by Oct 12, 2026, ~1.0M PRL/day, supply ~646M by Oct 2027 (+89%). 121.7M PRL came in the first six days at near-zero difficulty, holders unidentified. The one AI partner, Together AI, deprecated its Pearl endpoint on Aug 27, 2026

Score anatomy

Demand

6 / 45: the stronger of two routes, plus adoption

Why would anyone hold it: does value reach the token, and is the network or product used today?

Holder routing engine input
0

Nothing reaches holders by design

How this is scored

Revenue reality engine input
0

Under $0.5M/yr, or emissions-subsidized only

How this is scored

Monetary usage engine input
1

Pays transfer fees on Pearl; no other monetary use (panel 1).

Pays its own network's fees (gas never counts higher, whatever the size of the economy)high confidenceHow this is scored

Adoption ×3
0

No smart contracts or paying demand; a Jun 2026 preprint found the PoW produces no useful AI output, so mining is the only activity

No product use: the token is the product, or the network or product is not live or sits idlelow confidenceHow this is scored

Two routes, the stronger counts

01234501cash flowmoney
Revenue 0, minus 5 for routing 0 = cash flow 0. Money use 1. The engine is the stronger route: 1.

Soundness

9 / 40

Can a long-term holder trust the rules: supply, float, distribution and control?

Supply discipline ×3
0

~1.0M PRL/day mined (~100%/yr of the ~354M issued, Oct 2026) on S(h) = 2.1B*h/(h+650,226); supply reaches ~646M by Oct 2027.

Over 15%/yr, or a key, company, committee or multisig can mint without limit or redirect issuancehigh confidenceHow this is scored

Float and unlocks ×1
5

No premine, allocation or vesting: all mined PRL is liquid; new supply is mining issuance, scored under supply.

Fully vested, no scheduled unlockshigh confidenceHow this is scored

Distribution ×2
1

No premine, sale or VC, but difficulty-1 genesis minted 121.7M in six days, ~34% of the ~353M PRL ever issued, partly to fund the team; holders undisclosed

Insiders received 25-50%, or one organization directs 10-30%medium confidenceHow this is scored

Decentralization and security ×2
1

Kryptex mined ~49% of blocks over 30 days (52% over 24 hours on Oct 19, 2026) of a ~46 EH/s chain under a year old; one client; just short of a single-pool majority

A halt, rollback or exploited consensus bug in the last 24 months, attack cost under $10M, or a foundation-selected validator set or small multisig can halt or upgrade with no meaningful exit windowmedium confidenceHow this is scored

Durability

2 / 15

Is it big, proven and reachable by institutions?

Scale ×1
2

$708.6M market cap (band 3), $4.1M/day median volume (band 2), no flags.

Small: $50-250M market cap and $1M/day+How this is scored

Track record ×1
0

Genesis Apr 27, 2026: 0.5 years old.

Under 1 yearhigh confidenceHow this is scored

Institutional access ×1
0

No top-tier spot listing; trades on Ourbit, SafeTrade and BigONE (panel 0).

No top-tier exchangehigh confidenceHow this is scored

What would move it up

To reach T4 Speculative, one gate is still open:

  • Supply 0needs 1(open)

Tier outlook

Stable

  • Supply stays at 0 while mining adds more than 15% a year (~1.0M PRL a day now, ~0.7M by Oct 2027)
  • Security: the top pool's share against Kryptex's ~49% of blocks over 30 days
  • Revenue: a paid inference marketplace priced in PRL, or a new partner after Together AI's exit on Aug 27, 2026
  • Access: a first spot listing on Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, OKX or Bybit, beyond Ourbit, SafeTrade and BigONE
  • Usage: a shipped job-binding PoW upgrade that makes non-useful mining uneconomic

Research report

Oct 12, 2026 · source confidence 75%

Pearl is a proof-of-work chain launched in April 2026 whose mining is a matrix multiplication meant to double as AI computation. There was no token sale and the code has no premine or developer fee, but issuance is front-loaded: about 342 million of the 2.1 billion cap exist today, more than a third of them mined in the first six days, and the block reward still adds roughly one million PRL a day, so supply roughly doubles over the next year. Transaction fees go to miners and there is no burn or staking. The AI link so far is one inference partner whose discount is funded by mining rewards, and an independent June 2026 study found that current mining produces no useful AI output. Hashrate is concentrated, with one pool above half. Trading is thin relative to market value and concentrated on two smaller exchanges, plus a bridged ERC-20 on Uniswap.

Structure (12 facts)
Chain
Pearl mainnet (native, Bitcoin-derived UTXO chain with Taproot transfers); WPRL ERC-20 on Ethereum via PearlBridge (~3.04M supply, ~0.9% of float, upgradeable proxy owned by a non-Safe contract)
What it is
Proof of Useful Work L1: PoW is exact integer matrix multiplication on GPUs, pitched as a side effect of AI training/inference (Komargodski, Schen, Weinstein 2025, arXiv 2504.09971); built by Pearl Research Labs (CEO Omri Weinstein)
TGE
mainnet 2026-04-27, no token sale, no premine or dev fee in code (genesis coinbase 0); CoinGecko history from 2026-06-22; CEX venues SafeTrade and BigONE (from 2026-09-18), no tier-1 listing
Max supply
2,100,000,000
Circulating supply (approx)
342,200,000
Market cap (approx)
$470,000,000
Emission
S(h) = 2.1B * h / (h + 650,226) at a 194 s target block, no halvings; block 126,600 on 2026-10-12, reward ~2,263 PRL/block (~1.0M PRL/day, ~$1.4M/day at spot); supply ~646M by Oct 2027 (+89%), then ~+33% the following year; half the cap by ~2030
Launch concentration
difficulty started at 1 with a slow adjustment: blocks 0-40,000 came in ~5.9 days (~15x design speed) and minted ~121.7M PRL, 35.6% of all PRL existing on 2026-10-12; the whitepaper says the low initial difficulty was partly to fund the core team, whose holdings are undisclosed
Value accrual
None to holders. PRL pays block rewards and transfer fees; all fees go to miners via a Bitcoin-style auction, no burn, no staking, no smart contracts, no inference marketplace (future plan only). The one AI partner, Together AI (Gemma-4-31B-it-pearl endpoint, 2026-05-15), prices inference >25% below list and funds the discount from PRL emissions, with customers paying in USD, so the AI business model depends on selling PRL
Useful work
Basu, arXiv 2606.04819 (2026-06): ~24 EH/s then (~320k GPU-equivalents, ~112 MW) produced zero useful AI output; the dominant miner has no inference code and the verifier accepted random matrices (44 pool-accepted shares from CPU/AMD/Apple). Single author, not peer-reviewed, no formal team rebuttal found; core devs concede there is no on-chain usefulness metric (TechFlow 2026-10-10). Real AI formats (BF16/FP8) not yet supported by the PoW
Security
hashrate ~45.9 EH/s across 39 pools (MiningBoard 2026-10-12); Kryptex ~54% and pearlhash.xyz ~29%, so one pool holds a majority; official pool takes a 20% fee and accepts only H100/H200; rank-penalty softfork 2026-08-06 (block 96,251); no third-party audit found
Liquidity
~$3.5M/day CEX (SafeTrade ~67%, no trust score; BigONE ~33%), volume/mcap ~0.75% vs ~5% for TAO/RENDER; WPRL ~$0.5M/day on Uniswap V3/V4. Ticker collisions: Perle (PRL, Solana, the Coinbase/Upbit listings) and Parallel Governance (PRL) are unrelated

Market figures at report date (Oct 12, 2026)

Price (approx)
$1.37
FDV (approx)
$2,890,000,000
All-time high / low
1.76 (2026-09-23); ATL 0.14 (2026-07-23), so +880% off the low; ~$1.65 in late May before the July crash
Sources (10)

Compare with

How the ranking works and how PRL compares: see the full ranking. This entry as JSON:

GET https://tokens.10102.io/api/v1/tokenomics?symbol=PRL